Think

New Year’s resolutions broken? Think again…

January 27th, 2009

I’m just back from the gym, where things didn’t go so well.  I’m eating biscuits instead of fruit but at least I’m only on my first coffee of the day.
 
I read somewhere that the ancient Babylonians started this New Year’s resolution business but they didn’t focus on gym membership, diet or caffeine intake. Their most common resolution was to return all farm equipment that they had borrowed from their neighbours during the year.    Somehow returning the tractor seems a whole lot more achievable than my next workout.  

So how do I join the 63% of people who will have kept their resolutions by February?  

Like many people, my real challenge is avoiding those private “oh blow it!” moments – when all I want in the world is to sit down with a good book and a chocolate biscuit dunked in full fat cappuccino.  Typically, my downfall will occur at the end of a bad day (we all have them), when I’ll be tired and I’ll experience some powerfully self defeating thoughts, which go something like…

“I knew I could never change.  That workout was really pathetic.  People must have been laughing at me.”   Before I know it, I’ve talked myself out of my next gym session and I’m feeling like a failure. 

Recognising and preparing for these danger times is one way to keep on track.  Tackling my faulty thinking is another.   American psychotherapist Aaron Beck helped to develop Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) demonstrating that the negative ways we think about a situation (he called them negative automatic thoughts) affect how we act.  In turn, our actions can determine how we think and feel.  We need to change both the act of thinking (cognition) and behaviour at the same time.

CBT says that we often create our own problems. It is not the situation itself that is making us unhappy, but how we think about it and react to it.  

So I need to rethink my session at the gym today (and the fact that I’m now onto my third cup of coffee).  Beck offers four main questions to help challenge our negative view of things:-

  • What is the evidence?  Do the facts of the situation back up what I’m thinking?

I attended the gym today and did only 10 minutes on the treadmill and cut short my weight training.  It’s certainly more than I did last week but less than yesterday.  I also have no idea how people see me at the gym – they are more intent on their own training than on mine.

  • What alternative views are there?  How might someone else interpret what has happened?

This is my third time at the gym this week which for anyone is an achievement.  I was also feeling more tired than usual. 

  • What is the effect of thinking this way? Is it helpful and how does it influence how I feel and what I do?

What I want is to get fitter and thinking this way is not going to help me with that.  If I put myself down like this I will give up instead.

  • What illogical thinking errors am I making?  Am I jumping to conclusions, taking responsibility for things outside my control, over-generalising from a specific event.

Just because I cut my training short today does not mean I am a complete failure. I’m going back to the gym and my performance today does not automatically predict my results in the future.  As for the coffee, a few extra cups do not negate the progress I’ve made so far.  I can reduce my caffeine tomorrow by having a glass of water beside me as I work.

CBT is a scientifically proven approach developed originally to treat major mental health problems which is why most of the books available are geared to that market.  CBT also offers an everyday tool kit for challenging the unhelpful beliefs and attitudes that we all hold at some time in our lives, about ourselves and our capacity to change and grow.  The key elements of CBT include keeping records of behaviours,  thoughts and feelings, challenging the negative automatic thoughts which undermine our success and undertaking “experiments” to test out hypotheses about future behaviours.  In addition, Beck recommended we reward ourselves daily with activities which provide Pleasure and a sense of Mastery to maintain our progress. 

So, in a month’s time how will I be doing with those resolutions?  Chances are I’ll have had a few more setbacks (I’m human) but I’ll be challenging the way I think about these.  The odd slip up won’t mean the end of my progress.  By December I intend to be one of the 12% of people still pursuing their new year’s goals.  And If I find myself falling back into old habits? The secret will be not to beat myself up but pick up where I left off.

 Gill

Leading Teams in Tough Times

January 12th, 2009

The current economic climate is forcing many organizations to achieve more with less resources.  One of the keys to this is effective team leadership – the ability to manage the talent of individual team members while blending individual skills sets to achieve a collective goal. 

Teams are organizational groups composed of members who are interdependent, who share common goals, and who need to coordinate their activities to accomplish these goals (Kogler-Hill & Northouse, 2001).  The task of the leader is to focus on two distinct but related areas:

Team Performance – helping the group accomplish its task (task functions)
Team Development – keeping the group maintained and functioning (maintenance function)

This is a complex process requiring leaders to monitor the progress of team work, determine when to take action, and work out when it is most appropriate to focus on internal group issues or external concerns.    In Peter Northouse’s Leadership: Theory and Practice, Susan E. Kogler Hill highlights some specific team principles which can be used to help leaders manage this complex process.  These are derived from research into the critical discriminators between successful and unsuccessful teams carried out by Larson and Lafasto (1989) and include:

A clear elevating goal – Teams often fail because their objectives are unclear and they get pulled into non-value added activities such as firefighting or pursuing personal agendas.  The most effective way to ensure this does not happen is to agree a clear, motivating goal in which everyone in the team is invested.  

Results-driven structure – Different teams have different functions, and they need to find the optimal structure to achieve their goals.  For example, problem resolution teams need to emphasize trust so that people are willing to contribute; creative teams need to be structured to emphasize autonomy; project teams need to emphasize clarity so that everyone knows what to do and when.  Alongside this attention to the function and structure, it is critical that clear roles, good communications and methods to manage individuals are in place. 

Competent team members – This is about having the right number and mix of people to achieve the goals of the group. Team members need to be provided with adequate information and training to be effective in their roles.  As well as technical skills, individuals need to develop so-called ‘soft skills’.  These include interpersonal skills and an ability to collaborate and communicate effectively with one another. 

Unified commitment – This is about fostering a positive team spirit.  Effective teams share a common sense of purpose, are united by shared values and identify themselves as part of the team. 

Collaborative climate – An effective work environment is one where people can be open with one another, where they listen to and respect one another’s views, feel free to take risks and are willing to compensate for one another.   Kogler Hill highlights the importance of honesty, openness, consistency and respect in building this collaborative climate in the team. 

Standards of excellence – It is important that the team itself sets a clear standard to which all members are expected to perform.  This creates a degree of peer pressure which exerts a positive influence on individual effort and performance. 

External support and recognition – Kogler Hill points out that a common mistake is to give a team challenging objectives, and then fail to back this up with adequate organizational support.  Even with clear goals in which all are invested and the most competent team members, a team will fail if the following are not in place: clear direction, adequate information, resources, rewards and training.  

Principled leadership – The team leader can undermine the effectiveness of the team by failing to tackle poor performance.  Another barrier that leaders often inadvertently put in place involves setting too many priorities.  According to Kogler Hill, principled leadership is about coaching the team to work collaboratively and to share knowledge and skills throughout the team.  The leader’s role is also to focus the team on their unified goals, to encourage autonomy and to motivate team members.  

These factors provide the building blocks for effective team performance.  Getting the most out of individual contributors and blending these skills to produce a quality team product can help ensure business leaders get the most out of the people they lead in these tough times.    

Martin

Northouse, P.G. (2006).  Leadership: Theory and Practice.  Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks, California.